The Future is Past: Cloud Services Come of Age for Banks

For some, the future lies behind.

by Randy Davis, VP Sales and Marketing Operations

Banks and bankers are not, I suppose, usually perceived as harbingers of trends in technology, but kudos go to +Michael Harte, CIO at Commonwealth Bank of Australia, for getting it right back in 2010.

In our blog post at the time, Putting the Kibosh on Soaring Software and Maintenance Costs, we noted that Michael had recognized that select cloud vendors had solved his hardware/software problem, and that he didn't need to:

"We're saying that we will never buy another data center. We will never buy another rack or server or storage device or network device again. I will never let any organization that I work for get locked into proprietary hardware or software again. I'll never tell my teams in the business that it will be weeks to get them hardware provision. I'll never pay upfront for any infrastructure and certainly would never pay for any, or rent any, infrastructure that I would never use. I will never implement an internal solution for a common problem that I could procure on subscription across the Web (emphasis mine)."
                                                                                                  (Reported by Finextra.)

Now we read in an article by Bank Technology News titled, "Banks Are Finally Embracing Cloud Computing," that "banks are warming to cloud computing after nearly a decade of hesitation about trusting their data to outsiders." Michael Harte might say, "Welcome to the past, boys and girls."

However, the Institute of Financial Operations just published a report on "2013 Trends in Cloud-based and Mobile Technology in Financial Services," sponsored by eGistics (click the link and look under Media>Brochures). This study shows that many financial services companies still have a long way to go in recognizing the benefits of cloud-based services. Concerns about security, perhaps based on misinformation or misplaced fears, still prevent some FS organizations from embracing cloud solutions that have been carefully vetted by other banks and or bank servicing companies. This is an example of "The Emperor's Clothes" in reverse.

Rather than "seeing" what's not really there (higher security risks in proven cloud service providers), many banks may be ignoring what's really in plain sight (higher security capabilities provided by cloud providers consumed with protecting data).

Our view, of course, as a provider of "hosted" or "cloud-based" solutions to banks for almost 20 years, is that carefully vetted and chosen cloud-providers can (and do) deliver superior security and data management services. In our blog post, "Cloud Security Concerns Are Dead..." we argued that just as we have come to trust third-parties (banks) with our money, we will also come to trust third-parties (data banks) with our most sensitive data. It is the way of things.

So what should you do if you are hesitating to use cloud services? Here are some suggestions:

• Recognize that there are different kinds of cloud service providers. Understand the difference between general practitioners and specialists in handling financial services data
• Determine your requirements: Tier 4 data centers, certifications, experience with banking practices and operations, regulatory compliance, SLAs, scalability, etc.
• Visit the facilities and meet with the staff of prospective cloud service providers
• Talk to banks and FS companies that are using cloud services
• Don't focus just on high-profile cloud service providers. Consider that you may not want your cloud service provider to be "well known"

Post your comments about banks using cloud-services below.

Headlines Provide Reminders on the Importance of Disaster Recovery Planning

By Bob Lund

Speaking Wednesday on ABC TV's Good Morning America, Craig Fugate, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency said, "We don't always get to pick the next disaster."

Fugate was referring, of course, to the magnitude 5.9 earthquake that shook surprised residents in the Northeast Tuesday, and the strengthening hurricane that could hit the Eastern seaboard this weekend.

For some businesses, these headlines are a wake-up call to get their disaster recovery plans in order. The good news: cloud services make disaster recovery preparations more affordable than ever.

Higher Stakes
Although disaster recovery was once considered an expensive insurance policy for rare but catastrophic events such as earthquakes and hurricanes, enterprises are expanding their plans to address all sources of downtime, including mundane power outages (the number one cause of data loss for small businesses, according to research from Aberdeen Group), application failures (the top cause of data loss for large enterprises), network outages and human error.

And downtime occurs a lot more frequently than most people think: more than two-thirds of large enterprises (69 percent) need to recover data on a weekly or daily basis, Aberdeen Group reports.

With information technology now such a critical part of daily business operations, even brief business disruptions -- which may begin harmlessly, involve only one part of a company, and not appear as a more commonly thought of "disaster" -- can have a significant impact on a business, not to mention its customers. Consider the consequences of a lockbox processor missing bank deposit cut-offs on behalf of its customers. More often than not, it is these "quiet catastrophes" that generate the most significant threat to a business and its brand, according to research from Forrester.

Quite simply, there is less and less tolerance for downtime in a 24x7 economy, warns Forrester's Stephanie Balaouras.

By making disaster recovery planning a priority, operations can protect themselves from disasters big and small. Businesses get it. Improving business continuity and disaster recovery is the No. 1 priority for small and medium-sized businesses and the second-highest priority for large enterprises in 2011, according to research from Forrester. Similarly, AT&T's 2011 business continuity study reveals a trend towards greater emphasis on planning and responding to potential threats.

The problem for many of these companies is that it's hard to make capital investments in disaster recovery capabilities when they are under pressure to cut IT costs.

A New Model
Cloud-based archive and document management services offer a way for businesses to safeguard critical content and protect against a disruption in service, at an affordable, transaction-based price that requires no upfront capital investment or ongoing maintenance contracts. What's more, with some cloud services, businesses can leverage an infrastructure that includes mirrored, geographically dispersed data centers for real-time business continuity and automatic fail-over.

More businesses are recognizing the benefits of incorporating cloud technologies in their disaster recovery planning. A majority (54 percent) of organizations surveyed by AT&T currently use or are considering using cloud services to augment their business continuity and disaster recovery strategies. These businesses recognize that cloud services offer tremendous affordability and functionality for business continuity and disaster recovery planning.

The Bottom Line
Businesses can't pick when they'll be impacted by a disaster. But they can control how their organization plans for, and responds to, these events. Using cloud services, such as those for electronic document management, can be a critical element to preventing a disruption in service, protecting client data, and safeguarding the organization's reputation.

Bob Lund is chairman and CEO of eGistics, Inc., a leading provider of cloud-based document management solutions. Lund can be reached at 214-256-4610 or via blund@egisticsinc.com.

Process efficiency top IT objective

by Mark Brousseau, guest blogger

Making business processes more efficient and effective is the top objective of IT investments for 90 percent of the private companies surveyed for PricewaterhouseCoopers' latest Private Company Trendsetter Barometer. Streamlining business processes topped better management of enterprise data (identified by 75 percent of respondents), optimizing business information and analytics (73 percent), making business more agile (58 percent), and attracting new customers (58 percent).

And how do the companies hope to improve their business processes? Forty percent say they are likely to invest in cloud computing. What's more, over half of these companies stated that their investments in cloud-based solutions will be focused on "innovation," rather than "maintenance."

I think these companies have the right idea.

Technology plays a critical role in transforming operations and driving competitiveness for private and public companies. As companies look to better position themselves to take advantage of the economic recovery, they'll need a digital platform in place to capture, manage and deliver mission-critical data as efficiently and effectively as possible -- an area where cloud-based solutions shine.

Leveraging cloud-based solutions enables organizations to take a fresh approach to labor-intensive and error-prone document-driven business processes. For instance, eGistics' CloudDocs on-line document management solution eliminates the burden of determining where to store documents -- in terms of files and folders. It can recognize bar codes, which many businesses use to organize packets of documents, or even load documents into the system for indexing later. And once documents are loaded into CloudDocs, users don’t have to worry about where they are located; with a simple command, CloudDocs retrieves them instantly.

This type of functionality can streamline a wide range of applications -- accounts payable, accounts receivable, human resources and legal, to name a few -- freeing staff to focus more of their time on core competencies, servicing customers or developing innovative new products or services.

In my opinion, that makes IT investments in cloud computing money well spent.
_________________________________

Mark Brousseau, Brousseau & Associates
Mark Brousseau is a noted marketer, analyst, speaker, and writer, with more than 16 years of experience advising leading providers of payments and document automation solutions.

Brousseau is president of Brousseau & Associates, a full-service marketing, PR and business development firm based in Central Pennsylvania. With the largest client base of any independent marketing firm specializing in the payments and document automation arenas, Brousseau & Associates counts among its clients many top solutions and services providers.

You can follow Mark on Twitter @markbrousseau

Changing the CFO’s Perception of AP

By R. Edwin Pearce

Historically, if you asked a CFO to tell you the first thing that popped into their mind when you mention accounts payable (AP) processing, they likely would have responded with some variation of “cost center.” The fact is, as a percentage of revenue, the costs associated with AP processing typically represent a small blip on the radar of most companies. But as companies have tightened their spending as a result of the recent economic downturn, that blip is now a significant opportunity.

More than 75 percent of AP departments report into the CFO, according to various studies. With CFOs keenly interested in cost containment and improved cash management, AP leaders would be well served to find ways to deliver strategic benefits to the organization. Notably, 56 percent of CFOs believe AP represents a more strategic opportunity for improvements than it did two years ago.

One reason CFOs are changing their tune on AP is that they are seeking ways to avoid further layoffs, while weathering the recession. To this end, most are tightening controls over employee spending and placing greater emphasis on measuring and monitoring the company’s financial health.

These types of activities are clearly in the AP department’s wheelhouse.

CFOs are looking past the traditional paper-encumbered stereotype of AP and focusing more closely on the tremendous amount of financial data that flows through AP. From this perspective, they see AP as a means to improving working capital management, reducing supply chain risk, and greatly reducing the incidence of fraud. Most importantly, CFOs recognize that AP can help a company improve its cash position by extending days payables outstanding, avoiding late payments, capturing early-pay and volume discounts, and ensuring that payments and orders are compliant with contracts.

At many companies, AP no longer is merely a back-office transaction function where efficiency and low cost of operations are the only requisites for success; AP processes are being more tightly linked with treasury functions to help maximize working capital management. This is part of an overall move to align core processes across business functions to support corporate strategic initiatives.

While this increased corporate standing is good news for AP departments, they must also be ready for CFOs to more closely assess their performance based on key criteria such as costs, service delivery, error rates, timeliness of responses to inquiries, compliance, and vendor relationships.

This makes it imperative that AP departments continue their automation initiatives. Not only does automation help AP departments improve on-time payment performance, reduce errors, slash costs and enable greater visibility into financial data. But it also delivers the quantifiable data on process performance that CFOs will require as AP evolves into more strategic partner for their organization.

R. Edwin Pearce is executive vice president of sales and corporate development for eGistics, Inc., a provider of e-document solutions. He can be reached at 214-256-4607 or via epearce@egisticsinc.com.

Seeding the Cloud

By Randy Davis

A recent article in Banking & Payments Industry Update #1447 greeted the new year with prognostications about the use of cloud computing by traditionally conservative stalwarts such as "large banks" (who have been reluctant to outsource anything). Another article in Document Imaging Report (Dec. 23, 2010) waxed prolific on the growing influence of cloud computing on enterprise software, citing predictions by Saugatuck "that as much as 40% of new software sold in 2014 will be cloud-based."

OK. We experienced similar enthusiasm with the advent of ERP, CRM and the paperless society, and we'll see how this cloud euphoria plays out.

Don't get me wrong. I like the cloud, and believe that it will endure as a viable technology for the foreseeable future. I also like the flexibility it can provide in the rapid delivery of "pay as you go" services. In fact, eGistics has been a "cloud player" for almost 16 years, and is strongly moving forward with new, exciting services rooted in a cloud infrastructure. Using a well-worn cliche, "Watch This Space" for upcoming announcements regarding a new cloud e-document storage management service offering, as well as a "Platform as a Service" offering that enables companies to quickly enable their own applications to utilize e-document capabilities.

In the lyrical words of Bob Dylan, "the times they are a changin'," and, looking back on the economy of 2010, we can only say, thank heavens! We at eGistics look forward to working with you to provide new, cost effective and innovative solutions that will enhance your own service offerings to your customers and users.

By the way, please take our poll at the bottom of this blog page to indicate your company's interest in using the cloud!

Happy New Year!

Cloud computing's "green" credentials

By R. Edwin Pearce

The market for cloud computing has expanded quickly over the past few years, largely driven by its ability to deliver impressive economic benefits to cash-strapped organizations. But a new study finds that not only can cloud computing keep operations in the black, it also can help them be "green."

Pike Research reports that the growth of cloud computing will have important implications for both energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, by 2020 cloud computing will lead to a 38 percent reduction in worldwide data center energy expenditures, compared to a business-as-usual scenario, Pike Research reports.

“The growth of cloud computing will have a very significant positive effect on data center energy consumption,” says Pike Research Senior Analyst Eric Woods. “Few, if any, clean technologies have the capability to reduce energy expenditures and GHG production with so little business disruption. Software-as-a-service, infrastructure-as-a-service, and platform-as-a-service are all inherently more efficient models than conventional alternatives, and their adoption will be one of the largest contributing factors to the greening of enterprise IT.”

To be sure, cloud computing's "green" credentials and environmental impact aren't the top reasons for organizations to deploy the technology. But they are certainly key incremental benefits, particularly for organizations that list environmental sustainability among their strategic objectives.

R. Edwin Pearce is executive vice president of sales and corporate development for eGistics, Inc., a leading provider of hosted document management solutions. Pearce can be reached at 214-256-4607 or via epearce@egisticsinc.com.

Cloud computing growing up fast

By R. Edwin Pearce

The next year will be big for cloud computing, with the technology transitioning from “early adopter status” into a mainstream platform for IT. That’s according to IDC, a leading research and advisory firm, which ranked the maturation of cloud computing among its top IT predictions for 2011.

IDC predicts that spending on public IT cloud services will grow at more than five times the rate of the IT industry in 2011, up 30 percent from 2010, as organizations move a wider range of business applications into the cloud. Small and medium-sized business cloud use will surge in 2011, with adoption of some cloud resources topping 33 percent among U.S. midsize firms by year’s end.

“[Cloud computing] can no longer be invested in, or managed, as sandbox efforts around the edges of the market. Instead, they are rapidly becoming the market itself and must be addressed accordingly,” warns Frank Gens, senior vice president and chief analyst at Framingham, MA-based IDC.

Gens is exactly right. Organizations of all sizes are taking a hard look at cloud-based solutions as a way to avoid the hefty capital investments and ongoing maintenance and upgrade costs associated with traditional on-premise solutions, and to ensure their IT infrastructure remains up-to-date.

In addition to changing the way organizations access business applications, the growth of cloud computing also will bring mobile banking and payments one step closer to reality, IDC predicts. But this also is true of mobile applications in other industries, most notably healthcare and insurance.

What do you think?

R. Edwin Pearce is executive vice president of sales and corporate development at eGistics, Inc. (www.egisticsinc.com), a leading provider of hosted solutions for payments and document automation. He can be reached at 214-256-4607 or via e-mail at epearce@egisticsinc.com.

Healthcare Payables: From Bad to Worse?

By Amer Khan (akhan@egisticsinc.com) of eGistics (www.egisticsinc.com)

Effectively managing the payables process is a big job for most companies, but for healthcare organizations, it is a particularly tall order -- and it's about to get a lot more challenging.

The problem in managing healthcare payables stems from the byzantine network of buyer and seller relationships employed by most healthcare organizations, combined with the increasingly complex procurement processes and contracts that healthcare organizations use to purchase goods and services. Every day, the typical healthcare organization receives a mountain of invoices from many different suppliers, most under different contracts with potentially different payment arrangements.

When you mix in the unusually high number of suppliers that most healthcare organizations use -- a hospital might have thousands of suppliers compared to a few dozen for a big law firm -- you can see how the payables process can quickly become complicated. For instance, on a given day, a hospital might receive invoices for everything from Band-Aids to the pricey cardiology equipment it leases.

The healthcare industry's attempts to address the inefficiencies of the payables continuum have delivered mixed results. Several years ago, group purchasing organizations (GPOs) started sprouting up, allowing healthcare organizations to buy a range of goods and services from a single entity, rather than dealing with multiple vendors. While GPOs have enabled their customers to maximize discounts and reduce the number of vendors they do business with, there are still many cases where healthcare providers must source goods and services directly (such as buying from local suppliers), meaning they still must maintain a high number of supplier relationships.

Here's the scary part: the problem is likely to get worse. Every innovation in the healthcare industry -- whether it's new technologies, new devices or new drugs -- may create more suppliers, generating more invoices, contracts, payment arrangements, and, in some cases, acquisition channels. With our nation focusing like never before on innovations in healthcare, providers have no time to waste.

And while healthcare organizations are focusing tremendous amounts of time and resources on "big issues" such as meeting new requirements for electronic health records (EHRs) and ICD-10, driving down the costs associated with payables can deliver significant benefits as well, and in short order.

So, how can healthcare organizations accomplish this?

Since manual processes don't scale, the healthcare industry will need to rethink its approach to payables. The answer starts with eliminating paper at the earliest point possible in the process.

Whether it's converting paper invoices to electronic images, or convincing business partners to provide electronic invoices in the first place, eliminating paper simplifies and automates the payables process. It allows healthcare providers to apply automated rules for processing, and to initiate an electronic payment with detailed remittance information so the supplier can automatically post the receivables. With these types of solutions, providers can solve their current business challenges and lay a solid foundation to manage the increasingly complex payable environment that is sure to come.

What do you think?

Beyond SAS 70

By R. Edwin Pearce (www.epearce@egisticsinc.com)

A new study from Gartner confirms something that eGistics (www.egisticsinc.com) has known for some time: there's a lot more to effective security, privacy and continuity than compliance with Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 70.

"SAS 70 is basically an expensive auditing process to support compliance with financial reporting rules like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)," says French Caldwell, research vice president at Gartner. "Chief information security officers (CISOs), compliance and risk managers, vendor managers, procurement professionals, and others involved in the purchase or sale of IT services and software need to recognize that SAS 70 is not a security, continuity or privacy compliance standard."

Published by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), SAS 70 provides a service provider's auditor with guidance on how it should report on process-related risks relevant to financial statements and transaction processing. Intended for use by the customer's auditor, the result of a SAS 70 is either a Type I attestation that the processes as documented are sufficient to meet specific control objectives, or a Type II attestation, which additionally includes an on-site evaluation to determine whether the processes and controls actually function as anticipated.

Gartner believes a SAS 70 Type II evaluation does provide a very high degree of assurance that the examined controls are effective. The performance of controls is evaluated over a period of time; it is not just a snapshot of control effectiveness. However, customers should never assume that the provider has implemented all the appropriate controls, Gartner says.

"To ensure that vendor controls are effective for security, privacy compliance and vendor risk management, SAS 70 ... and other national audit standard equivalents should be supplemented with self-assessments and agreed-upon audit procedures," Caldwell explains.

Interested in learning more? E-mail me at epearce@egisticsinc.com.

Trends in ACH Dispute Management

Trends in ACH Dispute Management
Thursday, August 12 at 1 p.m. eastern

As ACH volumes have grown, so too have the number of ACH transaction disputes that processors must manage. Expensive to handle, these disputes are subject to a complex mix of rules and regulations, and can lead to hefty charge-offs if improperly managed. Just how big a problem are ACH disputes? This webinar will share the results of an exclusive survey of ACH processors on trends in ACH dispute management, including volumes, costs, levels of automation, future plans and more. Attendees will be able to benchmark their operations, gain actionable insights from our panelists, and learn what some processors are doing to automate their ACH dispute processing.

To register, click this link https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/589842392 or e-mail Dave Nitchman of IAPP-TAWPI at dnitchman@tawpi.org.

Panelists:
Rossana Salaris, principal, Radix Consulting
Amer Khan, senior vice president, product and sales support, eGistics

Moderator:
Mark Brousseau, facilitator, IAPP-TAWPI Payments and Receivables Council

Economic risks of data overload

By Ed Pearce (epearce@egisticsinc.com) of eGistics (http://www.egisticsinc.com/)

When data pours in by the millisecond and the mountain of information builds continuously, professionals inevitably cut corners and go with their 'gut' when making decisions that can impact financial markets, medical treatments or any number of time sensitive matters, according to a new study from Thomson Reuters. The study indicates that when faced with unsorted, unverified "raw" data, 60 percent of decision-makers will make "intuitive" decisions that can lead to poor outcomes.

Many government regulators have flagged increased financial risk-taking, which can be traced in some degree to imperfectly managed data, as a contributor to the recent financial crisis. Moreover, the world is awash with data -- roughly 800 exabytes -- and the velocity of information is increasing, Thomson Reuters says.

The challenge is that the staffing and investment needed to ensure that information and information channels are trusted, reliable and useful is not keeping pace. In fact, it is estimated that the information universe will increase by a factor of 44; the number of managed files by a factor of 67; storage by a factor of 30 but staffing and investment in careful management by a factor of 1.4.

"The solution to data overload is to provide decision makers with what Thomson Reuters calls Intelligent Information: better organized and structured information, rapidly conveyed to the users preferred device," says David Craig, executive vice president and chief strategy officer.

Fortunately, as the Thomson Reuters study notes, the same technological revolution that has resulted in the explosion of information also opens the way to new and improved tools for providing intelligent information: better organized and structured information, rapidly conveyed to the user's preferred device.

"We must use the benefits of the information technology revolution to minimize its risks. This is a joint task that the private sector and governments must closely focus on if we are to avoid systemic crises, in the future, whether we speak of finance, healthcare delivery, international security and a myriad of other areas," comments Craig.

How is your organization managing information overload?

Same-day ACH settlement highlights need for better dispute management tools

By Ed Pearce (epearce@egisticsinc.com)

Last week's announcement by the Federal Reserve Board of posting rules for a new same-day automated clearing house (ACH) service brought the topic front and center. Everyone from industry analysts and bloggers to trade publications and associations have expounded the pros and cons of same-day settlement. But virtually unmentioned in the all the hubbub is the potential for more ACH disputes as a result of accelerated settlement -- a scenario most banks are ill-prepared to manage.

Starting next month, the Federal Reserve Banks will be offering a same-day settlement service for certain ACH debit payments through its FedACH service. FedACH customers may opt-in to the service by completing a participation agreement. The service will be limited to transactions arising from consumer checks converted to ACH and consumer debit transfers initiated over the Internet and phone. Same-day forward debit transfers will post to a financial institution's Federal Reserve account at 5 p.m. eastern time, while same-day return debit transfers will post at 5:30 p.m.

As a result of the faster settlement, banks undoubtedly will see more consumers coming into their branches complaining of unauthorized transactions. The limitations of traditional in-house ACH systems and the strict time constraints and complex processing requirements imposed by NACHA rules and Regulation E already have led to sharp increases in operations expenses and higher charge-offs associated with ACH disputes. A new influx of consumer disputes will require financial institutions to implement a more centralized, more streamlined approach to dispute management.

Several features will be critical:

• Real-time distributed data access to any authorized user, anywhere
• Intuitive search capabilities
• The ability to annotate comments to disputed transactions
• The ability to export data
• Expanded search capabilities
• Filtering capabilities to block and restrict access to certain transactions
• Unlimited data storage

It may be some time before same-day ACH settlement achieves critical mass. But the next generation of consumers will demand it. This means that banks must begin adapting their ACH infrastructure today or risk even higher operations costs, as well as falling behind the competition. And this includes deploying sophisticated solutions to manage the inevitable spike in ACH disputes.

The state of storage

By Mark Brousseau (markbrousseau@tawpi.org)

Randy Davis (rdavis@egisticsinc.com) of eGistics, Inc. (www.egisticsinc.com) finds several interesting trends in The 2010 State of Storage Report from Networking Computing.

1. The top planned storage project for 2010 is improved allocation
2. Forty-seven percent of respondents say insufficient storage resources for mission-critical applications is their No. 1 concern
3. Storage area network (SAN) vendors are responding to demands for lower-cost storage
4. Storage virtualization is growing
5. Thin provisioning is catching on
6. There is a significant increase in interest in cloud-based storage

How do these trends reflect your storage strategy?

A welcome cloud during the economic recovery

By Ed Pearce (epearce@egisticsinc.com)

In spite of hopeful signs that the economy is on the mend, the 2010 State of Storage report from Network Computing finds that the fallout from the recession has left IT execs without the resources necessary to store the rising volume of information required to support their business applications.

Nearly half (47 percent) of the respondents to the survey say they have insufficient storage resources for their mission-critical applications, while 30 percent say they have insufficient tools for storage management. Another 30 percent of respondents say they have insufficient storage resources for departmental/individual use. Nineteen percent say they lack staff for their storage requirements.

And -- regardless of economic "green shoots" -- the situation isn't likely to change any time soon: 34 percent of respondents say they have an insufficient storage budget to meet their business demands.

Against this backdrop, it's little wonder that survey respondents are showing increased interest in cloud storage services (34 percent in 2010 versus 19 percent in the 2009 State of Storage report).

With a hosted variable cost storage model, if your business struggles, and your volumes drop, your operations costs will be aligned with your usage, and you won’t pay for a “just-in-case” capital investment. The variable cost model also eliminates the need for capital investment (software licenses and hardware) or maintenance contracts; customers typically are charged a one-time load fee to archive documents. And when an array fills up, or a server must be replaced, it’s your service provider’s problem. Using a thin-client interface, there may not even be software to install, manage or maintain. In addition, variably priced storage solutions can facilitate more effective operations by providing scalability that would be very cost prohibitive in a traditional, licensed in-house system.

CBA Chief Information Officer Michael Harte spoke for many users when he recently told the Committee for Economic Development in Australia that, "I will never implement an internal solution for a common problem that I could procure on subscription across the Web."

With the economic recovery still gaining strength, the trend for 2010 will be the more efficient use of existing IT resources. That should make hosted solutions a welcome cloud during the turnaround.

Putting the kibosh on the soaring software maintenance and upgrade costs

By Randy Davis (rdavis@egisticsinc.com)

Finextra reports that in a recent speech to the Committee for Economic Development in Australia (CEDA), CBA Chief Information Officer Michael Harte lambasted legacy technology vendors for their slow embrace of cloud-based computing and their apparent preference for solutions that lock-in users to a "never-ending spiral" of costly maintenance and upgrades.

"We're saying that we will never buy another data center. We will never buy another rack or server or storage device or network device again," Harte said. "I will never let any organization that I work for get locked into proprietary hardware or software again. I'll never tell my teams in the business that it will be weeks to get them hardware provision. I'll never pay upfront for any infrastructure and certainly would never pay for any, or rent any, infrastructure that I would never use."

Harte concluded: "I will never implement an internal solution for a common problem that I could procure on subscription across the Web."

With increasing demand for cloud-based solutions, combined with a general reluctance to pay hefty upfront capital costs, Harte's comments would seem to reflect growing dissatisfaction with the traditional licensed software model -- and its “never-ending spiral” of ongoing expenses.

Are you as fed-up as Harte?